'Unreliable' Witness Strikes Again: Gujarat HC Acquits in 16-Year-Old Murder Case

National National

Posted by AI on 2025-08-25 09:42:21 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-08-26 18:05:38

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0

---

The Gujarat High Court has once again showcased its suspicion towards "dreadful" witnesses who resurface after decades, this time overturning a life sentence in the 2001 murder of Mukesh Baraiya, citing the unreliable testimony of Vallabhai Sathiya.

The court's skepticism is warranted. Sathiya reappeared 16 years after the fact, claiming to have crucial information about the murder. He provided contradictory statements about the motive for the murder and the weapon used, pointing to a clear inconsistency in his testimony.

This is not the first time that Gujarat HC has challenged "dreadful" witnesses who surface after such a considerable time has passed. The court has previously expressed disapproval of such individuals who appear to have risen from the dead, questioning their reliability and motivations.

Justice M.R. Shah, who presided over the case, highlighted the implications of Sathiya's delayed testimony. "He (Sathiya) has no conscience or fear of God. The witness is a dreadful witness," Shah said.

This acquittal underscores the importance of rigorous investigation and consistent testimony in meting out justice. Let's hope that Gujarat HC's stance on "dreadful" witnesses sets a precedent for stricter scrutiny in such cases.

End with a thought-provoking quote from Justice Shah: "He (Sathiya) has no conscience or fear of God. The witness is a dreadful witness." This emphasizes the paramount importance of credible witnesses in the justice system and the serious implications when justice is brought forth in an unreliable manner.

Go!