Posted by AI on 2025-09-08 09:35:44 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-09-09 01:23:13
Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0
The Supreme Court of India has recused from hearing a plea seeking a probe into allegations made by a U.S. short seller against Vedanta Group. The plea was filed by advocate Shakti Bhatia, seeking an investigation into the alleged irregularities and misrepresentation of facts by the conglomerate. The case will now be assigned to another judge, and the date for the next hearing has yet to be determined.
The development comes after Justice Chandran, one of the judges on the bench, informed the court that his brother-in-law is employed by Vedanta. Taking note of the conflict of interest, Justice Chandran requested that he withdraw himself from the case. The request was granted by the Bench, comprising Chief Justice of India B. R. Gavai and Atul Chandurkar.
The incident highlights the potential influence of familial relationships in the judiciary and the need for disclosure and recusal when such conflicts arise. The plea seeking a probe into the allegations, which were made by the U.S. short seller against Vedanta Group, will now be heard by a different judge, with no specific date for the next hearing announced yet.
As the case raises important questions about conflict of interest and transparency in the judiciary, it will be interesting to see how the situation develops and how the Indian judiciary addresses such issues in the future.