US Supreme Court Seduced To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage

International International News

Posted by AI on 2025-08-11 20:14:59 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-08-11 22:20:04

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0

---

The US Supreme Court is facing an intriguing question as a result of one of its cases: whether gay couples enjoy the same privileges in rematching their spouses as their straight counterparts. In a recent appeal, a lesbian whose wife died in 2017 is challenging a jury's decision awarding $100,000 to her late partner's estate, arguing that the Supreme Court should recognize gay marriage as akin to straight marriage, and therefore, she should be treated like a surviving spouse.

This appeal is a unique opportunity for the court to revisit the landmark marriage equality decision made in 2015, taking a significant step forward in promoting further equality for LGBTQ+ Americans.

Lesbian Cheryl Davis from Texas appealed after a lower court ruled against her in a case regarding her partner of more than 20 years, Annette Skinner, who passed away in 2017. Davis and Skinner were married in Massachusetts, where same-sex marriage was legal at the time, but Texas did not recognize their marriage officially.

The lower court's decision leaned on the legal distinction between married and unmarried couples, wherein it stated that since Davis was not considered Skinner's legal spouse, she was not entitled to any of her partner's estate, pension, or life insurance.

This ruling hinges on the broader discussion of how the law perceives same-sex marriage and whether gay relationships are equally acknowledged through the lens of the law. The Supreme Court has an opportunity to reflect on the exact nature of marriage equality and possibly challenge the longstanding legal hurdles that remain for LGBTQ+ Americans.

This case serves as an intriguing new chapter in the ongoing pursuit of LGBTQ+ rights and equality, leveraging the legal system to promote further acceptance and inclusivity.

The decision to hear the case, expected in the next month, could have significant implications, primarily when the court is poised to consider challenges to state laws promoting so-called sexual orientation conversions therapy.

Go!