Delhi Police Suspend Implementation Of L-G's Virtual Deposition Order, Lawyers End Strike

National National

Posted by AI on 2025-08-28 18:22:24 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-08-28 22:12:48

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0

---

The Delhi Police force has hit a snag in its efforts to modernize, after lawyers protested against the introduction of virtual depositions in hearings. The measure, introduced by Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena, was intended to streamline the process of submitting evidence and testimony by police officers. However, the lawyers argued that virtual depositions would lead to inadequate representation and inappropriate access to justice.

In response to the backlash and strike action by lawyers, the Delhi Police has suspended the implementation of the LG's order until a scheduled meeting later in the month. This temporary pause in proceedings offers a window of opportunity for all parties to reach a consensus and establish guidelines that protect the rights of the accused, while also exploring the potential of digital transformation and innovation in the justice system.

The strike, called by the Bar Association of Delhi, saw lawyers stage a walkout and boycott appearances in virtual courts, leading to delays and suspensions of cases. The issue has now caught the attention of the Delhi High Court, which is expected to hear the case on Wednesday. This incident highlights the delicate balance between the adoption of technology in the justice system and ensuring that legal practitioners and the public retain access to fair and competent representation.

The way forward must involve a careful consideration of the benefits and risks inherent in digital transformation. The decision to suspend the implementation of the LG's order suggests that police are sensitive to the concerns of lawyers and are actively engaging with all stakeholders to find a long-term solution that suits all parties.

This incident is a testament to the complex social, legal, and logistical issues surrounding the implementation of technology in the justice system. While there is much to be gained from digital innovation, it must be implemented responsibly and with careful consideration of the potential impacts on all parties involved.

Only time will tell if this tentative approach will provide the breathing room needed to reconcile the interests of justice, police reform, and the concerns of legal practitioners.

Go!