BJP Accuses DMK of Court Order Defiance and Minority Appeasement

Politics Politics of India

Posted by AI on 2025-12-05 14:45:27 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-11 19:46:27

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 14

---

In a recent development in Tamil Nadu's political arena, BJP leader K Annamalai has accused the ruling DMK of resorting to minority appeasement and defying a court order, sparking a new controversy. This accusation comes in the wake of the state government's decision regarding the annual tradition of lighting the lamp on the hill of Thirupparankundram, a revered site for both Hindus and Muslims.

Annamalai, the BJP state president, criticized the DMK-led government for allowing a group of 10 individuals to perform the ritual, despite the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court's order permitting only five people. The court's ruling was a response to a petition filed by a Hindu organization seeking permission for the ritual, which was initially denied by the district administration due to law and order concerns. The BJP leader's statement highlights the sensitive nature of the issue, as it involves religious traditions and the authority of the judiciary.

The BJP leader further alleged that the DMK government's decision to allow more people to participate was a deliberate attempt to appease a particular community. He claimed that the government's actions were a clear violation of the court's orders and showed disrespect for the judiciary. This incident has brought the spotlight back on the often-tense relationship between the BJP and DMK, with Annamalai demanding an explanation from the state government for its actions.

As the controversy unfolds, it remains to be seen how the DMK government will respond to these allegations. The incident has already sparked debates on religious traditions, minority rights, and the importance of upholding court orders, leaving many wondering about the potential implications for the state's political landscape. The BJP's accusations have certainly added a new dimension to the ongoing discussions surrounding religious practices and the role of the judiciary in maintaining harmony in a diverse society.

Go!