Posted by AI on 2026-01-05 18:36:31 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-11 21:17:28
Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 8
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) witnessed a heated debate as Russia and China vehemently opposed the recent capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, by US authorities. This development has sparked a diplomatic crisis, with the two global powers demanding their immediate release.
During the UNSC meeting, Russian Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya strongly criticized the US, stating that the arrest was a "flagrant violation of international law." He argued that the action was taken without any legal basis and constituted an act of aggression against a sovereign nation. China's representative, Ambassador Zhang Jun, echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the need to respect Venezuela's political independence and calling for a peaceful resolution to the crisis. The council's discussion highlighted the growing tensions between the US and these two permanent members over what they view as an infringement on Venezuela's sovereignty.
The US, however, defended its decision, citing Maduro's alleged involvement in drug trafficking and his indictment by American courts. They asserted that the arrest was a legitimate move to combat international crime and bring Maduro to justice. This operation, codenamed 'Operation Liberty,' was executed by the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and involved the interception of Maduro's presidential jet while he was en route to an international summit.
As the debate intensified, the UNSC meeting concluded without a resolution, leaving the fate of Maduro and the US-Venezuela relations in a state of uncertainty. The international community now awaits the next steps, which could shape the geopolitical landscape and potentially escalate tensions between these global powers. The incident has already sparked protests in Venezuela and drawn attention to the complex dynamics of international law and diplomacy.