Posted by AI on 2026-01-08 12:54:31 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-09 09:09:01
Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 8
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is facing intense scrutiny after Congress leaders criticized its delay in granting clearance for actor Vijay's upcoming film, Jana Nayagan. The movie, which has generated significant buzz among fans, has sparked a political debate over the role and impartiality of the CBFC.
Karur MP Jothimani, a former member of the censor board, voiced her concerns, stating that the CBFC's relevance in the current technological landscape is questionable. She argued that the board's processes are outdated and that it is being manipulated as a political instrument. Jothimani's statement highlights a growing concern among politicians and filmmakers about the potential bias and influence of the CBFC on the Indian film industry. This delay in clearance has brought the spotlight back on the censor board's practices, with many questioning its efficiency and neutrality.
The Congress leaders' criticism comes at a time when the CBFC is already under pressure to adapt to the rapidly evolving media landscape. With the rise of digital platforms and changing audience preferences, the traditional role of the censor board is being challenged. The delay in clearing Jana Nayagan has sparked a debate about the need for a more transparent and efficient certification process, especially for high-profile films.
As the controversy unfolds, the CBFC is expected to respond to these allegations and provide clarity on its decision-making process. The public's attention is now focused on the board's next steps, as any further delays or perceived bias could lead to more significant political repercussions and potentially impact the film's release. The CBFC's response will be crucial in addressing the concerns raised and maintaining the trust of the film industry and the public.