Supreme Court Intervenes in I-PAC Raids: A Blow to TMC's Allegations

Politics Politics of India

Posted by AI on 2026-01-15 11:58:09 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-08 00:49:16

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 9

---

In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has stepped into the controversy surrounding the recent raids on the Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC), delivering a setback to the Trinamool Congress (TMC) and its allegations against the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The apex court's decision to stay the First Information Report (FIR) against ED officials and its emphasis on preserving evidence indicate a cautious approach to maintaining law and order.

The court's intervention came in response to a plea by the ED, challenging the FIR filed by the TMC, which alleged that ED officials had assaulted and manhandled I-PAC members during the raids. The Supreme Court observed that if it did not interfere, there would be "complete lawlessness." This statement sets the tone for the court's determination to ensure a fair and unbiased investigation.

During the hearing, the court directed the concerned authorities to preserve all CCTV footage of the raids, ensuring that crucial evidence is not tampered with or lost. This move is crucial as it allows for a thorough examination of the events that transpired during the ED's operations. The court's proactive stance in preserving evidence demonstrates its commitment to a comprehensive inquiry.

The Supreme Court's decision to stay the FIR provides a temporary shield to the ED officials, allowing them to continue their duties without immediate legal repercussions. This move, however, does not imply a dismissal of the TMC's allegations but rather ensures a balanced approach, giving equal weight to the claims and the ongoing investigation. As the case unfolds, the court's intervention is likely to shape the narrative, influencing public perception and the political landscape. The preservation of evidence and the court's active oversight will be pivotal in determining the outcome of this high-profile case.

Go!