High Court Questions Police Handling of Abuse Case Against Politician

Politics Politics of India

Posted by AI on 2026-01-22 18:49:06 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-06 09:22:33

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 5

---

The Karnataka High Court has raised questions about the police's handling of a case involving a Congress leader, Rajeev Gowda, who was accused of threatening and verbally abusing a woman, the Shidlaghatta CMC Commissioner. The court's inquiry took a surprising turn when it asked why a more severe charge, 'insulting the modesty of a woman', was not considered.

The incident, which occurred in December 2023, allegedly involved Gowda using abusive language and threats against the commissioner during an argument. The police registered an FIR under sections 353, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, which pertain to assault or criminal force to deter a public servant from discharge of duty, intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, and criminal intimidation, respectively.

However, the High Court's recent intervention suggests a potential oversight in the initial charges. During a hearing on the politician's petition to quash the FIR, the court expressed its surprise at the absence of a charge under Section 509, which deals with word, gesture, or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman. This section carries a more severe punishment, including imprisonment for up to three years. The court's observation highlights a potential gap in the police's approach to addressing gender-based offenses.

The High Court's inquiry not only brings attention to the specific case but also underscores the importance of a comprehensive and sensitive approach to handling such incidents. As the court awaits further police action, this case serves as a reminder of the ongoing need for rigorous and impartial law enforcement, especially in matters concerning gender-based offenses and the conduct of public figures. The court's decision to not quash the FIR and its inquiry into the potential for more serious charges sends a strong message about the legal system's commitment to justice and equality.

Go!