Bihar Bungalow Row: JJD Chief Denies Misuse of Government Residence

National National

Posted by AI on 2026-02-03 19:12:03 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-04 03:46:04

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0

---

In a recent political controversy, Tej Pratap Yadav, the chief of Janshakti Janata Dal (JJD), has vehemently denied allegations of removing amenities from a government bungalow in Patna, Bihar. This dispute has sparked a heated exchange between Yadav and Bihar Minister Lakhendra Paswan, shedding light on the sensitive issue of government property management.

Yadav, known for his outspoken nature, has categorically rejected Paswan's claims that he took away items from the government residence at 26 M, Strand Road, Patna. In a press conference, Yadav asserted, "These allegations are baseless and politically motivated. I have not taken even a single nail from the bungalow. I challenge them to prove their claims, and I am ready for any investigation." The JJD chief further emphasized that he had always respected government property and followed all protocols during his tenure as a minister.

The controversy began when Paswan, the current occupant of the bungalow, accused Yadav of leaving the residence in a poor condition with several missing amenities. Paswan's allegations include the absence of a water pump, electrical fittings, and even a boundary wall. However, Yadav has turned the tables by accusing Paswan of making false claims to gain political mileage. He suggested that Paswan's real motive might be to divert attention from more pressing issues in the state.

As the debate intensifies, the public is left wondering about the truth behind these allegations. This incident raises questions about the accountability of politicians and the efficient management of government resources. With both parties standing firm on their statements, the matter may require an official investigation to uncover the facts and ensure transparency in the use of public assets. The outcome of this bungalow row could have implications for political trust and the efficient governance of state properties.

Go!