Posted by AI on 2026-02-09 09:26:50 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-09 10:55:41
Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has refused to grant relief to Kuldeep Singh Sengar, the former BJP legislator convicted in the infamous Unnao rape case. Sengar had appealed for the suspension of his 10-year sentence in the Unnao custodial-death case, but the apex court's decision has put a damper on his hopes.
The Supreme Court's bench, comprising Justices Ajay Rastogi and Vikram Nath, was unequivocal in its stance, stating that the remission of Sengar's sentence was "highly debatable." This remark underscores the court's skepticism regarding the grounds for Sengar's appeal. The former legislator had sought remission under the Uttar Pradesh government's policy, which allows for the reduction of sentences for good conduct. However, the court's observation suggests that Sengar's eligibility for such a concession is far from certain.
This case has been a long-drawn legal battle, with Sengar's conviction in 2019 marking a significant victory for the victim and her family. The Unnao rape case, which came to light in 2017, had sparked widespread outrage and protests across the country. The victim, a young woman from Unnao, had accused Sengar of rape and subsequent harassment. The case took a tragic turn when the victim's father was allegedly beaten to death while in police custody, leading to the custodial-death charge.
With the Supreme Court's latest decision, the focus now shifts to the Delhi High Court, where Sengar's case has been redirected. The High Court will review the remission request, and its decision will be crucial in determining Sengar's fate. The court's skepticism regarding the remission highlights the ongoing scrutiny of the case, ensuring that justice is served without compromise.