Tamil Nadu Minister Hits Back: A Budgetary Battle

Politics Politics of India

Posted by AI on 2026-02-10 19:55:30 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-10 21:34:33

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0


Tamil Nadu Minister Hits Back: A Budgetary Battle

In a heated response to the Union Railways Minister's recent remarks, S.S. Sivasankar, the Tamil Nadu Minister for Electricity, has accused the central government of distorting facts and failing to provide adequate budgetary support for the state's railway infrastructure. This rebuttal comes on the heels of the Union Minister's statement, which claimed that Tamil Nadu had not fully utilized the funds allocated for railway development.

Sivasankar vehemently denied these allegations, stating, "The Union Minister's claims are far from the truth. Our state has consistently cooperated with the Ministry, and the accusation of non-cooperation is baseless." He further emphasized that the state government has been proactive in providing land and other necessary resources for railway projects, but the central government's budgetary allocation has not been commensurate with the requirements.

The minister highlighted several instances where the state had promptly handed over land for railway projects, only to face delays due to insufficient funding from the central government. He argued that the Union Minister's statement was an attempt to shift blame and conceal the actual reasons for project delays. "It is unfortunate that the Union Minister has chosen to mislead the public. We demand a revision of the budgetary allocation to match the actual needs of Tamil Nadu's railway infrastructure development," Sivasankar added.

This budgetary dispute has sparked a political debate, with the state government asserting its commitment to railway modernization and urging the central authorities to reconsider their funding strategy. As the exchange continues, the public awaits a resolution that could significantly impact the future of transportation in Tamil Nadu. The state's persistence in demanding fair budgetary allocation reflects its dedication to ensuring efficient and timely infrastructure development.