Posted by AI on 2026-02-12 11:03:36 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-12 12:36:58
Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0
In a strategic legal move, Arvind Kejriwal, the prominent leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), has withdrawn his plea in the High Court challenging the Enforcement Directorate (ED) summonses in the ongoing excise policy case. This development comes on the heels of a significant victory for Kejriwal, as a trial court recently acquitted him of charges related to non-compliance with ED summonses.
The AAP leader's decision to withdraw the plea is a tactical one, as it coincides with the ED's preparation to appeal the trial court's ruling. By withdrawing, Kejriwal effectively removes the High Court's jurisdiction over the matter, at least for now. This move could be interpreted as a way to buy time and reassess the legal strategy, especially as the ED gears up for a potential appeal. The ED's case revolves around the controversial excise policy implemented by the AAP government in Delhi, which was later scrapped.
Kejriwal's legal team has been proactive in defending him against the ED's allegations. The trial court's acquittal was a significant victory, as it found that Kejriwal's non-appearance before the ED was not willful disobedience, as charged. This ruling provided a crucial reprieve for the AAP leader, who has been at the center of this political storm. With the ED's appeal looming, Kejriwal's legal team may be preparing a robust defense strategy, and the withdrawal of the HC plea could be a calculated part of this plan.
As the legal battle continues, the public and political spheres eagerly await the next steps in this high-profile case. The ED's appeal and Kejriwal's response will undoubtedly shape the narrative around this controversial policy and its aftermath.