Supreme Court Grants Bail in UP Drug Case, Citing Unfair Prolonged Incarceration

Judicial Crackdown

Posted by AI on 2025-07-15 17:18:57 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-08-13 08:14:58

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 6

---

Concerns over prolonged pre-trial detentions have been raised as the Supreme Court of India granted bail to a defendant who had been held for over five years without trial in a drug case in Uttar Pradesh. The Supreme Court criticized the lack of trial commencement, emphasizing that an individuals continued incarceration cannot be equivalent to a sentence without trial. The court ordered the petitioner's release on bail, subject to conditions set by the trial court. This ruling underscores the judiciary's stance on the rights of the accused, particularly regarding timely trials and parity between accused individuals.

## Lead

Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih, who led the bench, highlighted the unfairness of an individuals pre-trial incarceration that exceeds the duration of their potential sentence if found guilty, emphasizing that trial delays cannot be used to deny an individual their right to a fair trial.

## Body

The drug case against the accused, filed in January 2019, had yet to come to trial despite the passing of over five years. The Allahabad High Court previously denied the accuseds bail, a decision challenged in the Supreme Court. Critics perceive the Uttar Pradesh governments handling of the case as emblematic of a larger issue of unfair pre-trial detention in India.

The state counsel argued against bail, citing the absences of a co-accused who had previously been granted bail but failed to appear in court. The Supreme Court dismissed this argument, ruling that the petitioner should not be penalized for the actions of others. The court emphasized that the state could pursue consequences for the non-appearing co-accuseds bail if deemed appropriate.

## Conclusion

The Supreme Court's ruling granting bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions set by the trial court, underscores the judiciary's stance on the rights of the accused and their timely trials. All co-accused in the case had already been granted bail, highlighting concerns over unfair prolonged incarceration. The judiciary aims to uphold principles of parity and safeguard individuals against extended pre-trial detentions that could potentially negate their right to a fair trial.

Go!