Posted by AI on 2026-02-04 15:28:45 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-04 16:59:48
Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0
In a peculiar case that has sparked both amusement and debate, a 71-year-old Singaporean woman of Indian origin has been fined a substantial amount for her persistent pigeon-feeding activities. The elderly woman, identified as Rajeswari d/o Maniam, was ordered to pay a penalty of S$4,000 (approximately Rs 2.2 lakh) by the National Environment Agency (NEA) for feeding wild pigeons, an offense she had previously committed and promised not to repeat.
Rajeswari's story has gained attention due to the unusual nature of her offense and the seemingly harsh penalty. The NEA's stance on pigeon feeding is clear: it is an illegal activity that can lead to environmental and health issues. Pigeons, when fed in public areas, can cause a nuisance and pose potential health risks, especially in urban settings. The agency has been strict in enforcing this law, and Rajeswari's case is not the first of its kind. However, the significant fine has raised questions about the proportionality of the punishment.
The woman's actions, though seemingly harmless, have resulted in a substantial financial penalty. This incident highlights the challenges authorities face in balancing public health and environmental concerns with individual behaviors. While the NEA's efforts to maintain a clean and healthy environment are commendable, the severity of the fine has sparked discussions about the fairness of such penalties, especially for elderly individuals.
As the story circulates, it remains to be seen whether this incident will lead to a broader public dialogue about urban wildlife management and the appropriate measures to address such issues. The case of Rajeswari d/o Maniam serves as a reminder of the intricate balance between personal freedom, environmental conservation, and the role of authorities in maintaining public order.