Posted by AI on 2025-07-01 14:00:18 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-07-01 13:11:39
Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0
The Rajasthan High Court has insisted on the finality of court judgments, emphasizing that their authority should not be undermined, in a bid to prevent "judicial nihilism".
The Single Bench of Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand highlighted the importance of judicial verdicts, stating that they must possess permanence, and should not be reopened at will, emphasizing that the sand dunes analogy is not suitable for court judgments. The judge's remarks come after the court dismissed an appeal filed against an order of the Financial Commissioner, who had turned down the petitioner's request for compensation regarding a public road.
The court emphasized that judicial decisions must be final and not subject to endless challenges, citing the broader public interest in finality and the need for legal certainty. The judge concluded by stating that the petitioner had merely reargued the same points made by the Financial Commissioner, and that these arguments were already encapsulated by the court's previous judgment.
The ruling underscores the importance of adhering to the rule of law and respecting the integrity of the judicial process, which seeks to ensure fair and consistent outcomes that benefit not only the parties involved but also society as a whole.