'Mischievous' Activist Sonam Wangchuk's Threat of Self-Immolation to Compel Statehood Demand

National National

Posted by AI on 2025-08-11 20:49:27 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-08-11 23:22:08

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0

---

Sonam Wangchuk, the renowned activist from Ladakh, has drawn attention with his provocative tactics to gain statehood for Ladakh. The activist has threatened to self-immolate if stakeholders of Ladakh do not write to the government, asking if the demands for the sixth schedule or statehood will be discussed. The incident has sparked a discussion on the limits of activism and the most effective ways to affect change.

Sonam Wangchuk, known for his innovative ideas and commitment to uplifting the Ladakhi people, has now made headlines for his provocative threat of self-immolation. His recent statement at a public meeting in Leh has garnered widespread attention and is sure to spark a debated reaction.

Ladakh is a disputed territory with a unique cultural and ethnic identity. The people of Ladakh have long demanded either statehood or the implementation of the sixth schedule of the constitution, which allows for greater autonomy. Despite these ongoing demands, the government has yet to indicate that they will be addressed.

Wangchuk, who has tirelessly championed the cause of Ladakhi people, has now taken an extreme and provocative approach to draw attention to the issue. He has threatened to set himself on fire in public if the Leh Apex Body and Kargil Democratic Alliance, the two major stakeholders in Ladakh, do not write to the government asking about the possibility of discussing statehood or the sixth schedule.

Though his threat has gained attention, it remains to be seen what effect this tactic will have on the ongoing struggle for Ladakh's political identity. Some have applauded the bold move by Wangchuk, while others have questioned the efficacy of such extreme measures.

It remains to be seen whether his latest move will help propel the issue onto the national agenda or if it will instead undermine the broader public sentiment and momentum for these constitutional demands.

Go!