'No Internal Feud': Madras Court Declines to Intervene in Father-Son Dispute

National National

Posted by AI on 2025-08-11 21:17:14 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-08-11 23:36:00

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0

---

The Madras High Court has refused to intervene in a "father-son dispute" involving the PMK party's internal meeting, emphasizing that the matter was best suited for civil proceedings, not through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The case caught public attention as an alleged feud between Dr. S. Ramadoss, the leader of the PMK, and his son, Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss, the party's deputy leader, ahead of the party's general council meeting.

According to the senior Ramadoss, the meeting notice had been issued in violation of the party's constitution and a conspiracy to overthrow the existing leadership. The notice for the meeting was issued by the party's working president, Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss.

The Court stressed that the legality of the meeting under the PMK's internal rules could only be examined in civil proceedings. It expressed dissatisfaction with the senior Ramadoss' failure to pursue internal party remedies before turning to the judiciary.

In conclusion, the Court's refusal to intervene sets a precedent for political parties to address internal disputes through established party mechanisms and/or civil proceedings, rather than through immediate judicial intervention.

Go!