Delhi RWAs, Political Leaders Push Back Against MCD’s Proposed Garbage Collection Fee

Politics Politics of India

Posted by NewAdmin on 2025-04-09 08:50:39 |

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 4


Delhi RWAs, Political Leaders Push Back Against MCD’s Proposed Garbage Collection Fee

A storm is brewing in the Capital as Residents’ Welfare Associations (RWAs) and political parties come together to oppose the Municipal Corporation of Delhi’s (MCD) decision to impose a garbage collection fee along with property tax. The proposal has drawn sharp criticism from citizens and leaders alike, citing inefficiency in services and a lack of public consultation.

Delhi, with over 4.3 million households, generates more than 11,000 tonnes of waste daily. However, MCD’s capacity to process this waste stands at just 7,200 tonnes, leaving a deficit of more than 3,800 tonnes per day. Despite the MCD’s claims of 100% door-to-door waste collection, ground reports and a recent ASCI audit revealed major gaps—only 43% of garbage reaches dhalaos or bins, while a significant portion is handled by private or informal collectors.

The proposed fee ranges from ₹50 to ₹200 per month for residential units, amounting to ₹600–2,400 annually based on property size. This has triggered concerns over dual payments, with residents already employing private waste collectors. RWAs argue the move penalizes honest taxpayers and lacks clarity on service accountability.

Political reactions were swift and pointed. AAP Mayor Mahesh Kumar Khichi accused the MCD commissioner of implementing an old BJP-era proposal without the council’s approval, while BJP leaders staged protests claiming collusion between AAP and MCD.

Environmentalists like Bharati Chaturvedi criticized the move for sidelining informal waste workers, arguing that the municipality risks displacing rather than integrating them.

RWA representatives from East, North, and South Delhi questioned the logic of mandatory charges without guarantees of improved services. Many demanded an optional, performance-based model instead of a blanket fee.

With mounting resistance and a growing chorus demanding transparency, MCD’s proposal may face further delays or reconsideration, especially with elections and public sentiment looming large.

Search
Categories