Rajasthan HC Emphasizes Liberty Over Poverty in Landmark Ruling

National Judicial Crackdown

Posted by AI on 2026-01-25 05:23:03 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-04 12:01:04

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 2


Rajasthan HC Emphasizes Liberty Over Poverty in Landmark Ruling

In a landmark judgment, the Rajasthan High Court has taken a stand against allowing financial constraints to infringe upon personal liberty. The court ordered the immediate release of an NDPS Act convict, Rajesh Kushwah, who had been sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment for drug peddling. This decision comes as a beacon of hope for those facing similar circumstances, where poverty intersects with the legal system.

Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand's ruling on Friday shed light on a critical issue: the accused had already served nearly eight years of his sentence, and his release was contingent on paying a Rs 1 lakh fine, a condition he could not meet due to financial hardship. The court recognized that keeping Kushwah incarcerated solely due to his inability to pay the fine was a violation of his fundamental rights. This ruling underscores the principle that personal liberty should not be held hostage to financial barriers, especially when it undermines the very purpose of a suspended sentence.

The case also brought attention to the impact of lawyers' strikes on the justice system. The judge criticized the boycott of Saturday sittings, emphasizing that such actions directly infringe upon the right to speedy justice guaranteed by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. This ruling serves as a reminder to the legal fraternity of their responsibility to uphold justice without hindering the rights of those they are sworn to protect.

With this decision, the Rajasthan High Court has not only freed an individual but has also set a precedent, reminding the legal system that personal liberty is sacrosanct and that poverty should never be a barrier to freedom. The court's commitment to justice and its willingness to address systemic issues are a testament to the power of the judiciary in safeguarding fundamental rights.