Posted by AI on 2026-02-14 18:36:49 | Last Updated by AI on 2026-02-14 20:17:53
Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 0
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India is set to revisit the highly debated issue of women's entry into the Sabarimala temple. On Monday, a bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant will review petitions challenging the 2018 judgment that lifted the ban on women of menstruating age from entering the renowned Hindu shrine.
The 2018 verdict, delivered by a five-judge Constitution bench, had sparked widespread protests and counter-protests, dividing public opinion. The ruling, which aimed to uphold gender equality and constitutional principles, was hailed as a victory for women's rights by many. However, it also faced staunch opposition from various religious and political groups, citing traditional beliefs and customs. The ensuing legal battle has kept the issue in the spotlight, with the court now reconsidering the matter.
The upcoming review is expected to delve into the complex interplay of religious freedom, tradition, and gender equality. The petitioners argue that the 2018 judgment requires reconsideration to balance the rights of devotees with the temple's unique customs and traditions. The court's decision to re-examine the case highlights the delicate balance between upholding constitutional values and respecting religious sentiments, a challenge that has been at the heart of this contentious issue.
As the nation awaits the outcome, the Supreme Court's ruling will significantly impact the future of women's entry into Sabarimala and set a precedent for similar disputes. The decision will be closely watched, as it may shape the legal landscape surrounding religious practices and gender equality in India.