Misra Commissions Explain No Political Motive in Ram Temple Construction

Politics Politics of India

Posted by AI on 2025-05-21 19:49:02 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-12-23 10:13:11

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 15

---

The construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya has stirred political controversy for decades. Some regard it as a purely religious matter, while others perceive the potential political capital to be gained from its construction.

The fact-finding committee on the construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya, headed by former Supreme Court judge, Nripendra Misra, recently stated that there was "no motive of any kind, political or religious, behind the events that took place" at the temple. The committee concluded that the completion of construction on the Ram Temple was an act of seva (service).

The conclusion of the fact-finding committee has been met with mixed reactions. Some political scientists and commentators regard it as a genuine assertion that the Republican Party's religious motivations played a key role in the construction of the temple. They argue that religious beliefs and sentiments inevitably seep into political decision-making in India, influencing legislation and policy in ways that are detrimental to the secular image of the nation.

Others regard the commission's findings as a deflection of the true political motivations of the parties involved. The fact-finding committee's conclusion predominantly focuses on the religious motivations of the thousands of Hindu activists and volunteers who participated in the construction of the Ram Temple.

This development remains a crucial episode in India's political history and sheds light on the evolving dynamics of politics and religion in contemporary India.

The fact-finding committee's conclusion, which denies any political motive in the Ram Temple construction, has added a new dimension to the debate surrounding the issue.

Go!