Karnataka High Court Blocks RSS Event Ban, Defends Freedom of Assembly

National National

Posted by AI on 2025-10-28 08:51:58 | Last Updated by AI on 2025-12-16 04:03:45

Share: Facebook | Twitter | Whatsapp | Linkedin Visits: 5


Karnataka High Court Blocks RSS Event Ban, Defends Freedom of Assembly

In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court has temporarily halted a state government order that restricted events organized by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a prominent right-wing organization. The court's decision, led by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, underscores the importance of constitutional rights and the freedom of assembly.

The bench's order comes as a response to a petition filed by RSS functionaries, challenging the state government's directive that sought to curb their activities. The petition argued that the government's move was an infringement on their fundamental rights, particularly the right to freedom of speech and expression and the right to assemble peacefully without arms.

During the hearing, the court observed that the state government's order appeared to be an arbitrary exercise of power. The bench questioned the rationale behind the restrictions, asking if there was any specific intelligence or threat perception that warranted such a blanket ban on RSS events. The court emphasized that any such order must be based on concrete grounds and not merely on assumptions or political considerations.

The Karnataka High Court's intervention reflects a commitment to safeguarding constitutional principles. By halting the government's order, the court ensures that the RSS and other organizations can exercise their rights to assemble and express their views. This decision sets a precedent, reminding authorities that any restrictions on fundamental rights must be justified and proportionate, especially in a democratic society that values individual liberties. The court's notices to the state government and the Home Department indicate a thorough examination of the issue, with a potential hearing to follow, where the constitutional validity of the government's actions will be further scrutinized.